|
|
(1) | 2002 |
participants |
Do you predict that worldwide changes, which took place in the aftermath of September 11 / 2001, could be related to the Arabs as ... Arabic cartoons by M. Kahil It is worth looking at them each day when searching for polling results ! |
62.9% positive ? 34.6% |
(2) | 10.2.-13.2. |
Do you consider that Iran will be the 2nd target in an U.S. attack ? |
19.5% no 77.6% |
|
(3) | 25.2.-28.2. |
Do you consider that the United States of America will succeed in toppling the regime of Iraq ? |
24.1% no 72.5% |
|
(4) | 3.3.-6.3. |
Do you enjoy [Lybian president] Gadhafi`s proposition in favour of a common state for, both, the Palestinians and the Israeli ? |
19.9% no 78.4% |
|
(5) | 9.3.-12.3. |
Do you consider [Israeli prime minister] Sharon coming out for conditions of appeasement after the following has happened ? LE MONDE diplomatique (March edition) citing HA'ARETZ (18/01/02), Tel Aviv: Increasing group of Israeli soldiers opposing their task and describing it as "inhuman towards the Palestinians". |
U.S. criticism of his policy 11.3% a reactivation of Palestinian attacks 85.6% no idea 3.1% |
|
(6) | 15.3.-18.3. |
ARAB NEWS, Saudi Arabia (10/04/02): U.S. credibility at stake, says crown prince of Morocco. Did the U.S. administration go for an efficient application of pressure against Sharon, in order to stop Israeli terrorism ? ARAB NEWS, Saudi Arabia (30/04/02): Competing to win election funds and Jewish votes, U.S. Republicans and Democrats are engaged in a mindless race where each candidate tries to outdo his opponent in the appeasement of the Jewish community. [opinion] |
5.6% no 93.4% |
|
(7) | 21.3.-24.3 |
Do you consider that a [public] uprise might facilitate the beating of Iraq ? |
75.2% no 22.4% |
|
(8) | 5.4.-8.4. |
AL-JAZEERA, Qatar (24/04/02): Anti-American demonstrations in Djakarta expressing the wish of the world's most numerous Muslim nation to cut all links between Indonesia and the United States. What kind of measures could impose a most efficient popular pressure on America ... ASHARQ AL-AWSAT, Riyadh (20/04/02): Four persons wounded in the frame of anti-American manifestations and actions of emotion in a Jordanian camp, and during a public congress held in al-Azhar mosque. |
a denial of services to U.S. ships and planes ? 27.1% an embargo of trading goods ? 59.8% letters of protest sent to the Bush administration ? 2.4% other measures ? 10.7% |
|
(9) | 2.4.-5.4. |
Headlines of HA'ARETZ, Tel Aviv (15/04/02): - Germany suspends military equipment sales to Israel (confirmed by German Defense Minister R. Scharping on Sunday, April 14) - Britain puts unofficial embargo on arms exports to Israel (British newspaper The Guardian citing official sources on Saturday, April 13) - Opinion: The problem facing Arab leaders What kind of measures could be a most efficient support for the Palestinian Intifada of our days ? GULF DAILY NEWS, Bahrain (17/04/02): - Government officials in the Kingdom of Bahrain are seeing off aid trucks for Palestine. - Nelson Mandela says in Bahrain that U.S. politics "are creating chaos on an international level". ARAB NEWS, Saudi Arabia (12/05/02): The shift in Palestinian fighting strategy. ... From the stone-throwing intifada to a war in the normal sense. |
the declaration of a Holy War 50% the application of petrol as a weapon 19.2% the opening of borders [which would enable all pro-Palestine volunteers to enter Jordan and other neighbouring countries] 18.7% an economic embargo [hitting their enemies] 11.3% no idea 0.8% |
|
(10) | 11.4.-14.4. |
MIDDLE EAST ONLINE, London (22/04/02): The Iraqi president Saddam Hussein pledges 25.000 dollars for each destroyed home in Jenin, Palestine. Which step, taken by Iraq and directed at a suspension of oil exportation, would express Iraqi solidarity with the Palestinians ? Headlines of Al-JAZEERA, Qatar:.............cartoon - Iraqi vice president A. expressing belief that military actions against his country cannot be excluded, even if foreign inspectors are allowed to come back to resume their task. (25/04/02) - Bagdad forces its merchants to study general Islamic law ("fiqh") when handling affairs. (26/04/02) |
demonstration of active [Panarabic] nationalism 41% an isolated activity without any pathos 16% the request of a similar decision [made by other Arabic nations] 41.3% no idea 1.7% |
|
(11) | 14.4.-18.4. |
The reaction of Palestinian authorities on the required condemnation of self-sacrifice operations will be of the following kind at the beginning of negotiations... LA TRIBUNE, Algier (16/04/02): Le phenomène kamikaze palestinien a encore de l'avenir. Sharon's policy of security doesn't leave another choice; - the Palestinian phenomenon of kamikaze still has its future. |
seen as a justified act 26.7% seen as an act that cannot be justified 69.8% no idea 3.5% |
|
(12) | 18.4.-21.4. |
AL-HYAT, London (8/05/02): Pakistani theologues stand for a confrontation with the U.S. Are you in favor of a persistent blooming of the religious party (Hizbollah) and their military actions against Israel, even though they lacked success in the first round ? AL-JAZEERA, Qatar (7/05/02): Two Kurdish organizations in northern Iraq announced their future cooperation in military actions, carried out on behalf of the Islamic community. |
91.1% no 7.6% no idea 1.3% |
|
(13) | 21.4.-24.4. |
Is there any probability that a [monitoring] commission, obliged to report about the national realities, will put Israel at the origin of the massacres in Jenin ? |
29.4% no 67.2% no idea 3.4% |
|
(14) | 24.4.-27.4. |
Could it be possible that an Arabic initiative comes into being after Israeli incursions on the Westbank [i.e. into Palestinian "autonomous" territory] ? |
11.3% no 86.2% no idea 2.6% |
|
(15) | 28.4.-30.4. |
Will actual Israeli incursions finally succeed in interrupting Palestinian self-sacrifice operations ? |
4.8% no 93.7% no idea 1.5% |
|
(16) | 30.4.-3.5. |
Which measure would be the best to escape from the present crisis in Middle East ? ARAB NEWS, Saudi Arabia (05/2002): Profiles of courage: U.S. lawmakers stand up for moral justice in the Middle East. [A few Congressmen expressing their doubts about the traditional Middle East policy of their country that is usually backing Israel.] |
continued resistance 79.4% the launch of some initiative, meant to "salvage the Saudis" 15.4% other measures 5.2% |
|
(17) | 3.5.-6.5. |
Do you consider the national security council as a perfect means of investigation with regard to the massacres in the camp of Jenin ? |
3.9% no 94.6% no idea 1.5% |
|
(18) | 6.5.-9.5. |
Do you wish the [Palestinian] authority consenting to an expulsion of Palestinians, prior to any termination of siege of the Church of Birth [in Bethlehem] ? |
12.3% no 85.4% no idea 2.3% |
|
(19) | 9.5.-12.5. |
Do you cherish a mass rebellion of the Arabic nation, on behalf of the Palestinian cause, calling for a legal investigation of domestic events ? ARAB NEWS, Saudi Arabia (30/04/02): "Stop the Western media from overruling voice of reason": Arab League Secretary-General Moussa said that the Arab countries must finance a global media campaign to explain their position on the Middle East conflict. |
73% no 22.7% no idea 4.3% |
|
(21) | 15.5.-18.5. |
Do you count on the success of reforms that are now being contemplated by the Palestinian authorities ? |
15.7% no 80% no idea 4.3% |
|
(22) | 18.5.-21.5. |
ASHARQ AL-AWSAT, Riyadh (13/05/2002): "Friends of Al-Qaeda" are preparing an assault on the residency of the Yemenite prime minister. Are there any commercial means of protection, to be imposed by Washington on its partners, that are able to reject the consequences of "September attacks" for U.S. economy ? AL-JAZEERA, Qatar (23/05/2002): Lebanon denying U.S. report on a conference between the [Palestinian religious party] Hizbollah and leaders of Al-Qaeda, presided by Oussama Bin Laden. Their meeting should have taken place last March in Lebanon in order to coordinate further attacks. Both, Hizbollah and the Lebanese government disclaim any knowledge. |
67.7% no 22.9% no idea 9.4% |
|
(24) | 24.5.-27.5. |
Do you consider Washington to be serious in their attempt aimed at the suspension of a possible war between India and Pakistan ? AL-JAZEERA, Qatar (29/05/2002): U.S. chase of the organized remains of Al-Qaeda and Taliban drives enemy into Kashmir from where problems are expected. |
10.5% no 86.5% no idea 3% |
|
(25) | 26.5.-26.6. polling ! |
4.861 altogether: 8.599 |
What will be the [essential] outcome of elections for the National Assembly of the Algerian People ? RADIO EGYPT (English, 9.475 kHz, 01/06/2002): The Algerian National Liberation Front FLNA gains a convincing majority of votes in Algerian elections. |
beginning relaxation of political tensions 21.7% (21.7%) the formation of a stable nation 67% (66.9%) other results 11.2% (11.4%) |
(26) | 9.6.-12.6. |
Could you imagine the foundation of an [independent] Palestinian state as a guarantee for the suspension of [further] commando operations against Israel ? AL-JAZEERA, Qatar (/06/2002): |
34.7% no 62.3% no idea 3% |
|
(27) | 12.6.-15.6. |
ALQUDS-AL-ARABI (the Palestinian daily, 18/06/2002): - Second rang Al-Qaeda members are forming alliances in x order to hit U.S. targets. - Rumours are spread of a recent interview with Bin Laden. - Moroccan forces arrested individuals suspected of being x related with Al-QAEDA. Do you believe in an U.S. report dealing with the matter of a [terrorist] being accused to plan the detonation of a radioactive ["dirty"] bomb [in the Washington area] ? AL-JAZEERA, Qatar (14/06/2002 - 10:30 h GMT, 15/06/2002): Report from their correspondent in Pakistan: About 10 persons killed and many wounded in a bombing that affected the U.S.A. consulate in Karachi. A car loaded with explosives caused much damage to the consulate building, shortly after U.S. secretary of state Donald Rumsfeld ended his talks with Islamabad. Unknown Islamic group AL-KANUN confessing the deed. an early morning president receiving latest bad news another model terrorist who specialized in "dirty" bombs |
7.1% no 89.1% no idea 3.8% |
|
(28) | 15.6.-15.7. polling ! |
Which would be the best solution to the Kashmir problem between India and Pakistan ? ARAB NEWS, Saudi Arabia (29/06/2002): - Indian Prime Minister Vajpayee yesterday pledged free x elections in insurgency-wracked Kashmir. Vajpayee is x hoping the election due by Oct. 14 will be incident-free. - Separatists have already called for a boycott of the polls, x alleging that past votes that have brought to power Chief x Minister Farooq Abdullah’s National Conference party x were rigged. - Kashmir activists, meanwhile, have vowed to "sabotage" x the polls and warned voters not to show up on election day. |
taking the matter to the International Court of Justice [in Den Haag] ? 18.2% the installation of a monitoring system at the Indian front line ? 4.3% the organisation of a public referendum ? 65.6% other solutions ? 11.9% |
|
(29) | 21.6.-24.6. |
|
9.8% no 88.6% no idea 1.6% |
|
---|---|---|---|---|
(30) | 24.6.-27.6. |
72.1% no 21.2% no idea 6.7% |
||
(31) | 27.6.-30.6. |
|
(29.2)% no (66.2)% no idea (4.7)% |
|
(32) | 30.6.-3.7. |
22.2% no 73.3% no idea 4.5% |
||
(33) | 3.7.-6.7. |
Will there be a toll of lives to be paid when the U.S.A. veto the International Criminal Court ['s unrestricted competence], thus paralyzing its efficiency ? There was a problem of interpretation when two Arabic words with a very similar writing and a very different meaning were mixed up. That problem has now be solved. W.W. |
71.5% no 24.3% no idea 4.2% |
|
(34) | 6.7.-9.7. |
AL-JAZEERA, Qatar (14/07/2002): The Arabic League and Jordan renewing their opposition directed against an attack on Iraq. If the dialogue between Iraq and the United Nations leads to nowhere, will such result open the door for an intensification of U.S. sentiments against Bagdad ? ASHARQ AL-AWSAT, Riyadh (19/07/2002): Malaysian prime minister Mahmod Mahadir declares: An attack on Iraq will provoke Muslims all over the world. [Malysia is a multiethnic Islamic nation.] |
86.7% no 10.4% no idea 2.8% |
|
(36) | 15.7.-18.7. |
Do you consider any possibility of the return to royal rule in Iraq as a substitute for the actual [political] system ? [ That question is obviously referring to a constellation, regarded as a practicable alternative and comprising of Saddam Hussein being replaced by his own son. ] |
20.4% no 74.3% no idea 5.3% |
|
(38) | 21.7.-24.7. |
AL-JAZEERA, Qatar (23/07/2002): Karthum is showing interest in an agreement, to be achieved in Nairobi, while practising a kind of "cautious confrontation" at the same time. Do you predict the realisation of an agreement between the Sudanese government and the "rebels of salvation" ? ARAB NEWS, Riyadh (24/07/2002): The Sudanese government and a delegation of the rebels, controlling southern Sudan, recently gathered in Nairobi for talks on a cease-fire. Although both parties left with- out any definite result, such talks are seen as a first step towards normalisation. The poor northern part of Sudan, represented by a Muslim government in Karthum, and the Christian South, controlled by a rebel army, are already fighting for political and economic supremacy for many years. Recent development forced Karthum to consider a request for support directed to the Arab League. |
33.3% no 58.5% no idea 8.3% |
|
(39) | 24.7.-27.7. |
|
75.5% no 20.2% no idea 4.3% |
|
(40) | 27.7.-30.7. |
7.9% no 90.5% no idea 1.6% |
||
(41) | 30.7.-2.8. |
While there is much confusion about an expected U.S. attack on Iraq, AL-JAZEERA has resumed its polling on that question and made it a longtime polling (31.7.-30.8.2002). Results will be communicated as soon as they are known to the editor. In the frame of a new culmination of Palestinian Intifada and on the basis of western and Arabic allies warning the U.S. from launch- ing an attack on Iraq, this seems to be a wise decision. However, it cannot be excluded that the first news on a senseless military move of the Bush administration will reach us faster than Al- JAZEERA's latest polling results. .......... W. W. (06/08/2002) Will America proceed to hitting Iraq before a suspension of Palestinian uprise (Intifada) ? AL-JAZEERA, Qatar (04/08/2002), is raising the question: Countdown on Iraq already started ?"Has the countdown really been started on the actual systemof power in Iraq, or will that affair turn into nothing more than an integrating part of psychological warfare, practised by the United States of America by means of its information machinery and a gigantic diplomacy on the basis of a pursuit of political profit ? ... As to the problem, - propagated by the U.S administration and from which they derive the essential legitimacy for its annihilation -, does it really lie in the actual system of power ? Or does it hide that systematic proceeding of the U.S., finally leading to an opening of Iraq and the entire Middle East by making use of the "Father of Evil" [Saddam Hussein], yet without experiencing any consequences." |
72.5% no 22.4% no idea 5.2% |
|
(47) | 20.8.-23.8. |
As to the Arabic nations, decided to avoid an attack on Iraq, what kind of action should be their duty ? |
18.2% a normalization of their relations with Baghdad 43.7% initialization of a summit to be held in Baghdad 29.9% no idea 8.2% |
|
(48) | 23.8.-26.8. |
Regarding an attack on Iraq, do you predict a decrease of its probability in the present situation ? |
38.9% no 57% no idea 4% |
|
(49) | 26.8.-30.8. |
What would be the most probable official answer from Syria to the national alliance that has been proclaimed by opposition groups in London ? ARAB NEWS, Riyadh (22/08/02): Syria expresses solidarity with Riyadh: Prince Abdullah, the regent of Saudi Arabia, yesterday received a message from Syrian President Bashar Assad. Political observers said the message was to express Syria’s solidarity with Riyadh in the wake of a new US media campaign directed against the Kingdom. Political observers have emphasized the need for Arab states taking a joint stand to avoid the threatened US strike on Iraq, adding that such a war would have dangerous consequences. |
(13)% rejection (75)% no idea (11.9)% |
|
(50) | 30.8.-2.9. |
Do you predict that the controversy between America and their allies will lead to a failure of their directive to stage a military coup against Iraq ? ARAB NEWS, Riyadh (06/09/02): Baghdad and fellow Arab states warned US President G. Bush yesterday that attacking Iraq will "open the gates of hell" in the Middle East, although White House officials pressed ahead with a drive to win support for their war plans. |
34.6% no 62.1% no idea 3.3% |
|
(51) | 2.9.-5.9. |
Do you count on the stability of the European position that is now opposing an attack on Iraq ? |
33.1% no 63.8% no idea 3% |
|
(52) | 5.9.-8.9. |
Do you believe that a global summit could serve as an appropriate mechanism for the solution of such evident problems like poverty and development ? |
12.2% no 83.6% no idea 4.2% |
|
(53) | 8.9.-15.9. |
After having entirely surpassed the events of September, into which direction the U.S. administration would lead the world ? |
58.3% an intellectual change of comprehension re- garding the service in favor of U.S. profits 23.7% a new effort to draw the political map 14.4% the realisation of peace and salvation 3.6% |
|
(54) | 15.9.-19.9. |
Do you confirm that the Arabic nations will support a military coup, launched against Iraq, in case of the United Nations passing a [consenting] resolution ? |
76.8% no 20.3% no idea 2.9% |
|
(55) | 19.9.-22.9. |
Are the United States of America likely to launch an attack on Iraq, even though Iraq accepted the return of [U.N.] inspectors ? ARAB NEWS, Riyadh (20/09/02): Waiting for the invasion of IraqDespite all the diplomatic maneuvering by the Bush adminis-tration at the U. N. in New York, and by the regime of Saddam Hussein, it now seems quite clear that the United States will be invading Iraq to institute a change of regime. It’s not a question of "if"; it’s a question of "when?" |
87.1% no 10.2% no idea 2.8% |
|
(56) | 22.9.-25.9. |
What is behind the U.S. firm decision of launching a military coup against Iraq ? ASHARQ AL-AWSAT, Riyadh (19/09/02): According to U.S. intelligence sources, it is considered to send more than 800 special troops to the southern part of the Arabian peninsula in order to track members of Al-Qaeda in Jemen. The troops should operate from their base in Djibouti (Somalia). The Republic of Jemen is known to oppose such plans. |
alleged weapons of mass annihilation 3.7% control of the petrol sources 83.4% other reasons 12.8% |
|
(59) | 3.10.-6.10. |
Do you consider the existence of a relation between the probable U.S. attack on Iraq and plans for a deportation of Palestinians to [Iraqi] locations ? AL-JAZEERA, Qatar (29/09/02): Driving out the Palestinians. |
76.4% no 18.2% no idea 5.3% |
|
(60) | 6.10.-9.10. |
Will there be a boycott of the peace negotiations in the civil war that is haunting the southern part of Sudan ? |
16.3% no 75.6% no idea 8% |
|
(61) | 12.10.-15.10. |
Would you like a recommendation of the [Arabic] ministers of information, assembled in the Council of Cooperation, to silence the channel of "Al-Jazeera" and to close all of their editorial offices ? |
20.2% no 77.4% no idea 2.4% |
|
(62) | 15.10.-18.10. |
Those operations directed against the French oil tanker [in southern Jemen] and against U.S. forces in Kuwait, are they showing a reconstruction of Al-Qaeda's internal organisation ? |
60.4% no 30% no idea 9.6% |
|
(63) | 18.10.-21.10. |
As to the leaders of the Iraqi Kurds, are they right to settle their score with the regime when it comes to a [military] adventure in that country ? |
21.2% no 74.9% no idea 3.9% |
|
(64) | 21.10.-24.10. |
If the Iraqi president decided to pardon political prisoners, would that facilitate an extensive reduction of the political tensions ? |
47% no 47.6% no idea 5.4% |
|
(65) | longtime polling |
As to the [general] election [results] in Morocco, what [kind of development] are they indicating ? The Moroccan minister of the interior, Driss Jettou, has been elected in the September 2002 general elections and confirmed by King Mohammed VI as the new prime minister of Morocco. The general elections are characterized by an increase of votes in favor of the moderate Islamists. An article, published by the French daily LE MONDE (30/09/2002)), is indicating political stability in the North African kingdom. |
a desired change 34.3% preservation of the political climate 60% another development 5.6% |
|
(66) | 27.10.-30.10. |
Do you cherish the Libyan decision to withdraw from the Arab League ? ARAB NEWS, Riyadh (28/10/02): Egypt and Saudi Arabia want Arab countries to work to- ward presenting a united front to the world, the Saudi Foreign Minister Prince Saud Al-Faisal said yesterday. The comments follow Libya’s decision last week to with- draw from the Arab League in protest at what it said was the failure of Arab states to take a stronger stance against any US attack on Iraq and Israeli attempts to crush a Pales- tinian uprising. |
73% no 24.4% no idea 2.6% |
|
(67) | 30.10.-2.11. |
Would you agree that the new Palestinian government is suitable to the ambitions of the Palestinian people ? |
8.4% no 82.7% no idea 8.8% |
|
(68) | 2.11.-5.11. |
Will the Turkish army allow the Islamists to take over [political] power in Turkey ? THE STRAITS TIMES, Singapore (05/11/02): Propelled by voter anger over a two-year economic crisis, a party with Islamic roots easily won the national elections in Turkey held on November 3, such sweeping a corrupt govern- nment from power and igniting fears of a showdown with a staunchly secular military. Projections by Anatolia showed the Justice party taking 361 seats in the 550-member Parliament, meaning that the party can form a government without any coalition partners - the first time in 15 years that a party has been able to rule alone. Mr. Tayyip Erdogan, the party's leader, immediately moved to calm fears of a shift to religion, emphasising stability and a pro-European Union outlook. |
17.7% no 77.4% no idea 4.9% |
|
(69) | 5.11.-8.11. |
Will America proceed to an attack on Iraq in case of a Security Council's decision that doesn't include the application of [military] force ? BBC NEWS, London (08/11/02): The UN Security Council has unanimously endorsed a long- awaited tough resolution, designed to force Iraq to give up its weapons of mass destruction. |
81.1% no 15.4% no idea 3.5% |
|
(70) | 8.11.-11.11. |
Will Arabic [TV channels] react in favor of such U.S. voices urging to stop the production of further [lies] made in Israel ? AL-JAZEERA, Qatar (05/11/02): Baghdad is expecting the participation of Israel in a war against their country. |
45.8% no 54.2% |
|
(71) | 11.11.-14.11. |
As to the latest events, are they really proving an opposition against the military attack of Iraq, even though the prohibition of public demonstrations never ceased to be in force ? |
76.5% no 17.3% no idea 6.2% |
|
(72) | 14.11.-17.11. |
After Bin Laden's latest recording, do you consider [his] orga- nization of Al-Qaeda still being able to launch further attacks ? |
79.5% no 15.3% no idea 5.2% |
|
(73) | 17.11.-20.11. |
Do you think that the proceedings of a [weaponry] inspection in Iraq will penetrate [their target] with absolute neutrality ? |
10.3% no 86.7% no idea 3% |
|
(75) | 23.11.-26.11. |
Do you consider those recent attacks that were aiming at American citizens in some Arabic countries as being .... |
popular reaction ? 81.8% a realisation of Al- Qaeda operations ? 13.2% [of other origin] 5% |
|
(77) | 29.11.-2.12. |
Do you appreciate that coup against Israeli interest outside of an occupied Palestine ? [This question is obviously referring to the Mombasa incident (28/11/02) where Israeli citizens were killed and wounded in their Kenyan holiday resort.] |
87.5% no 10.2% undecided 2.3% |
|
(78) | 30.11.-7.12. |
AL-JAZEERA, Qatar (29/11/02): Iraqi bloodshed in an U.S.-British air raid. Planes, that entered Iraq, came from their U.S. bases in Kuwait. As to Iraqi headquarters, mainly civil institutions were hit. Do you expect the neutrality of weaponry inspectors in Iraq to cause Washington to abandon their pretext for hostilities ? AL-JAZEERA, Qatar (03/12/02): Iraqi coast guard opened fire on approaching boats in order to protect the coast of neighbouring Kuwait. AL-JAZEERA, Qatar (07/12/02): Saddam Hussein apologized for the invasion of Kuwait. A report, comprising all Iraqi programs of rearmament, was handed over to the U.N. commission in Baghdad. |
21.2% no 75.5% no idea 3.3% |
|
(79) | 7.12.-10.12. |
Do you estimate that the United States are beginning to cut off their relations with Saudi-Arabia ? |
61.6% no 34.8% no idea 3.6% |
|
(80) | 7.12.-14.12. |
Will it be favourable for the Iraqi [government] to proceed meeting [all] international exigencies in the shadow of the U.S. who are decided to attack them ? AL-JAZEERA, Doha / Qatar (12/12/02): Headline: "Washington and Doha declaring that there are no military advantages in any [direct] relations with Iraq." "The face to face meeting between U.S. secretary of state Donald Rumsfeld and the foreign minister of Qatar on the evening of December 11 has given the official blessing for a manifold presence of U.S. military on their base in Qatar. It was Qatar that had left a community of 2000 on their base at disposition of the U.S. without the signature [of a treaty], which could turn out an advantage when the time has come." |
52.9% no 43.4% no idea 3.7% |
|
(81) | 14.12.-17.12. |
Will Turkey's relation to the world of Islam suffer from Turkey's affiliation with the European Union ? |
43.6% no 51.4% no idea 5% |
|
(82) | 14.12.-21.12. |
A relaxation of the Russian position in the Iraq issue, will it turn to one of the following results / positions ? |
of joint U.S. and Russian interests ? 64.6% the conviction of a substitution of the Iraqi regime ? 25.9% other results ? 9.4% |
|
(83) | 21.12.-24.12. |
Will there be a transformation of the Council for a Coope- ration of the Gulf [States] from a political assembly into a mere coalition of economic [interests] ? |
65.4% no 22.8% no idea 11.8% |
|
(84) | 24.12.-27.12. |
Do you estimate America willing to declare war against North Korea in order to care for their nuclear weapons ? BBC NEWS, London (01/01/03): "US seeks diplomatic solution in North Korea US President George Bush says America is involved in a diplomatic show- down with North Korea, not a military one." |
13.3% no 84.5% no idea 2.2% |
|
(87) | -2.1.03 first result registered in 2003 |
As to the declarations of those Arabic [countries] that abstain from participating in a most probable war on Iraq, will they be [taken as] ..... |
12.1% not serious ? 85.1% otherwise ? 2.8% |
|
Will the declarations regarding a liberation of Iraq, that are now being made by Pres. Bush, turn [sooner or later] into a desperate construction of excuses from Washington [intended to justify] the invasion ? [Additional polling that completes a special feature on Iraq.] |
82.5% no 15.1% no idea 2.4% |
|||
Who is responsible for the weakness of the official Arabic position ? [i.e. the official Arabic position in the Iraqi question and a common attitude towards U.S. foreign poli- cy under the Bush administration] AL-JAZEERA, Qatar (11/01/03): Headline: "Iraq criticizes the common Arabic position towards U.S. intimidations." The Iraqi vice president Tariq Aziz is cited from a speech he made in Algiers during his recent visit of dif- ferent countries in the Arabic world. The above photo shows T. Aziz shaking hands with the Algerian minister of foreign affairs. |
the Arabic world 83.2% U.S. politics 7.1% the smaller countries of the Arabic world 6.7% no idea 3% |
|||
Do you consider the assistance of foreign troups in the overthrow of despotic regimes as being helpful for the nations concerned ? Electronic attack on AL-JAZEERA's server: Manipulation of polling results by external activity. As BLUEPRINT has recorded two interim results of the actual polling, I am now able to reconstruct the genuine polling results ! W. Wiesner date: 11/01 participants: 7.082 results: yes: 16.8% no: 81% no idea: 2.1% date: 12/01 participants: 15.487 results: yes: 17.3% no: 80.6% no idea: 2.1% Usually, figures from intermediate results and final results don't differ too much, i.e. only within the bounds of some 0.1%. This time however, the final result presented itself with the following figures: date: 14/01 participants: 75.759 results: yes: 59.3% no: 39.7% no idea: 1.1% By the way, the total of participants is exceeding any reasonable number of voters that has been recorded so far (=> compare with earlier pollings). It simply looks like the result of "automatic multiple voting". Whoever launched that electronic attack on AL-JAZEERA, they should be aware that there is no fooling the people as it used to be. The proof: Just look at the pictures taken during anti-war manifestations in Rawalpindi (Pakistan), Damascus (Syria), Amman (Jordan) and Cairo (Egypt) [left to right and top to bottom, as reported by AL-JAZEERA, 18/01/03]. |
(17.3)% no (80.6)% no idea (2.1)% |
|||
Could you imagine the people of Iraq fighting against U.S. troops that are invading their country ? Headlines from AL-JAZEERA (31/01/2003): Intense consultations among Arab leaders on the Iraqi crisis. Washington in trouble: A "soft diplomacy" towards Kuwait xxand Saudi-Arabia. |
71.5% no 25.7% no idea 2.8% |
|||
As to the last letter from Oussama Bin Laden, will it make rise the Arabic and Islamic nations against their regimes ? AL-JAZEERA (11/02/2003): Another tape record from Bin Laden accuses the socialistic regimes of certain Arabic nations as being alienated from Islamic belief. |
34.9% no 56.4% no idea 8.7% |
|||
With regard to the [Iraqi] crisis, could the conclusion reached by any Arabic summit be advantageous for the solution of that crisis ? |
20.1% no 76.9% no idea 3% |
|||
Do you support a call for Al-Qaeda organisation in order to help expel U.S. troops from the Gulf ? |
87% no 10.2% no idea 2.8% |
|||
Who could be held responsible for the failure in reaching a common conclusion during the extraordinary summit of the Arabic nations ? ARAB NEWS, Riyadh (2/03/2003): "There is No Future For the Arab League" "Drama at Arab League Summit" citations: Sharm El-Sheikh, 2 March 2003 — Leaders from 22 Arab countries yesterday strongly opposed the planned US-led military attack on Iraq as a threat to Arab national security, and said their countries would not participate in any war. A final communique issued after the one-day summit here also blasted the “attempts to impose changes in the region,” in a reference to US demands that President Saddam Hussein be re- moved from power. The general peaceful atmosphere at the summit, however, was broken by an open UAE call for Saddam Hussein to step down, and by an attack by Libyan leader Muammar Qaddafi’s against Saudi Arabia. Crown Prince Abdullah, who led the Kingdom’s delegation, threatened to withdraw from the conference after an angry exchange of words with the Libyan leader. ..... |
of 24/02/03 : Kuwait and Saudi-Arabia (66.6)% Egypt (17.2)% Lebanon (4)% no idea (12.2)% |
|||
Would it cost a toll of lives to reach an agreement of the Arabic nations, regarding a rejection of any attack on Iraq or the support of initiatives intended to avoid the war ? |
33.9% no 63.9% no idea 2.2% |
|||
Could you imagine the political parties of Iran, once having received a common Arabic judgement, to adopt its point of view in the frame of their own revolutionary symbolism ? |
31.9% no 60.8% no idea 7.3% |
|||
What attitude will dominate the climate of a summit between America, Britain and Spain on the issue of the Iraqi crisis ? |
declaration of war 70.1% Assembled partners refraining from war 3.2% The search for an escape route from the current situation 24.6% no idea 2.2% |
|||
As to the United States of America, will they succeed in overthrowing the regime of Iraq's president Saddam ? |
42.1% no 51.5% no idea 6.4% |
|||
Do you predict that the U.S. will be making use of chemical, biological and radioactive weapons in their war against Iraq ? The rotten regime of Saddam Hussein and their secret weapons. In a televised speech, U.S. president George W. Bush announces the beginning of military action against Iraq (20 March 2003, 4:15 a.m. Central European Time). At almost the same time, the people of Baghdad experience the first air raid of Gulf War III. |
77.1% no 19.9% no idea 3.1% |
|||
Western sources report that the Bush administration has accused the Syrian government for their logistic support of Saddam Hussein's army. Syria denies any support and declares such accusation being founded on the fact that U.S. troops recently encountered difficulties during their invasion of Iraq. [31/03/2003] Do you consider the [coming] elections in Syria as a means to indicate Syrian "sentiments of the street" ? AL-JAZEERA (16/04/03): Headline: "Syria rejects U.S. accusations, considering them as mere intimidations and inventions." Syria condemns U.S. accusations, directed against them and regarding the [supposed] development of chemical weapons, as intimidations and inventions that serve the cause of Israel. The Syrian council of ministers announced in an official bulletin that "an intensification of the language of intim- idations and the use of it to express those accusations, is just another aspect for which such Americans can be held responsible who are expressing their anti-Syrian attitude. They are aspiring to the benefits of determination and the influence they exert over national decisions and the posi- tions of (Arabic) nationalists." |
25.8% no 69.7% no idea 4.6% |
|||
Could you realize that the multitude of wars, launched by the U.S., has caused the hatred of all nations involved ? |
89.9% no 8.9% no idea 1.2% |
|||
What do you consider to be the most important subject to the poeple of Iraq ? |
foreign [troops] 50.3% humanitarian aid 22.5% the formation of a new government 22.8% no idea 4.5% |
|||
Do you expect the formation of a democratic government in Iraq ? |
19.2% no 76.8% no idea 4.1% |
|||
Do you expect continued attacks in the Gulf region after the detonations of Ryadh ? |
85.3% no 9.1% no idea 5.6% |
|||
Who will be the main profiteer of a [United Nations'] resolution, intended to lift the economic ban from Iraq ? |
86.5% the people of Iraq 11.2% no idea 2.3% |
|||
Regarding the [suicide] attacks that hit U.S. troops in Iraq, how could they be interpreted : According to different reports, launched by AL-JAZEERA (i.e. 15/06/2003) and western sources, U.S. troops are re- peatedly attacked in Iraq. The town of Falujah seems to be a center of rebellion. Those incidents are accompanied by a growing frustration of Arabic people when it comes to the fact that weapons of mass destruction cannot be found in Iraq, despite former U.S. accusations that have finally led to an occupation of that country. |
of a fight against occupation ? 77.4% as the remainings of a resistance in favor of the late regime ? 18.4% no idea 4.1% |
|||
As to the Arabic presentation on the summit of Sharm El Sheikh, does it put an end to the minor role of the Arabic League ? This question is referring to the meeting of U.S. president Bush and Egypt's president Mubarak on June 3, 2003. In that meeting, other leaders of the Arabic world took part, like Crown Prince Abdallah from Saudi Arabia and the King of Jordan. The Saudi Crown Prince acted on behalf of the Arabic League in Beirut who thus put their propositions, intended to solve the conflict between Israelis and Palestinians. [Info based on U.S. report] |
69.8% no 23.4% no idea 6.8% |
|||
longtime polling |
Do you favor the questionable and self-sufficient positions of Saudi Arabia, leading to a violation of their own system of laws ? |
(13.8)% no (85.8)% no idea (0.3)% |
||
longtime polling |
Which aspect should dominate our relationship with Al-Qaeda organisation ? |
security problem 18.6% the opening of a dialogue 67.8% no idea 13.6% |
||
Do you consider the World Economic Forum in Jordan to be defining its goal in the speeding up of a normalisation (of its relations) with Israel ? |
88.6% no 6.9% no idea 4.4% |
|||
Do you consider the actual resistance in Iraq to be turning into a national uprise ("a matter of the people") ? AL-JAZEERA (30/06/03): "The U.S. are launching another attack against Iraqi resistance." "U.S. occupation forces, including jet fighters and armored cars, attacked more than 20 targets in the region north of Baghdad in an effort to stop armed resistance." |
82% no 15.1% no idea 3% |
|||
Do you cherish Ghadafi's proposition favoring the formation of a single state for, both, Palestinians and Israelis ? |
(24.5)% no (73.4)% no idea (2.1)% |
|||
Do you support a cease-fire between Palestinian squads and Israel after the latest proceedings ? |
67.1% no 32.9% |
|||
As a result of a blow on the persuasion that Israel might release even the rest of those Palestinians held in custody, the following would happen: WASHINGTON POST (12/08/2003): Headline: "Back-to-Back Suicide Bombings Rupture Mideast Calm" "Suicide bombers blew themselves up at a strip mall in Israel and a bus stop at a Jewish West Bank settlement Tuesday, killing two Israelis, shattering a summer of relative calm and raising new doubt about the fate of a shaky Mideast truce." |
fire and a return to resistance 68.1%% continuation of the negotiated modus vivendi 7.1% an increase of U.S. pressure on Israel 24.8% |
|||
Do you predict Israel realizing their threat against all those from Syria and Lebanon, involved in that (recent) bombardment of Israeli (farmers), which had been carried out by Hizbollah ? |
47.1% no 52.9% no idea % |
|||
Quand l'université arabe de Kaboul se présente avec une délégation à une réunion des autorités iraquiennes dans leurs rassemblements, ça peut être considéré comme : When the Arabic University of Kabul presents itself with a delegation at a reunion of Iraqi authorities in their assemblies, should that be considered as : |
soumission à la pression américaine ? a submission to American pressure ? 84.5 % un pas pour retrouver sa souveraineté à l'Iraque ? a step towards renewal of Iraqi authority ? 15.5 % |
|||
L'Amérique, a-t-elle réussi dans sa guerre contre la soi-disant terreur, deux ans après les événements de Septembre ? Did America succeed in their war against the so-called terrorism after the two years that followed the September incidents ? |
9% non / no 91% |
|||
Peut-on compter sur la soustraction de Washington face à l'obstruction israélien de contacter Arafat quand il s'agit du "feuille de route" (route map) ? When it comes to the "route map", is it possible to count on Washington drawing back, as soon as it faces Israeli refusal to contact Arafat ? |
81.5% non / no 18.5% |
|||
Please note ! Some additional polling results that are covering latest proceedings in "post-war" Iraq have been embedded in a brand-new BLUEPRINT site: Independence Day 2003 Have a closer look at a widespread resistance against U.S. occupation. | ||||
|
[percentage] |
The Breaking News on Central Asia can be obtained from another website, compiled by Wolfgang Wiesner on the basis of Arabic publications (AL-JAZEERA, AL-HYAT,..).